don't listen to the crap the stalker is NOT a lie!

Category: Let's talk

Post 1 by Goblin (I have proven to myself and the world that I need mental help) on Tuesday, 08-Mar-2005 10:56:03

ok so far today I have been openly accused of lying and neither poster will tell me why..hmmm? However I would like to point out that the problem I'm having with the stalker is entirely true...as you know I started wheelchair basketballk for reasons I'm not going into here..the guy is a member of the team...I became friends with him,and unfortunately the feelings of attraction grew on my part and on his, but I decided to break it off as my feelings were getting out of hand, he refused to accept this and he has been plaguing me constantly with phone calls,following,turning up where I'm most likely to be, and asking me to compose songs for his wedding! ect...I'm now left with no option but to involve the police...so once again I ask you to ignore those malicious creatures who are trying to discredit me...as if I would choose to inflict any more stress on myself...
thankyou Alex...

Post 2 by lawlord (I'm going for the prolific poster awards!) on Tuesday, 08-Mar-2005 11:04:34

Malicious creatures.....did you borrow such phraseology from the British National Party Website? They often talk about malicious creatures in the media etc. But Goblin honestly, speaking as one whom you see as an accuser, if you're so worried about it then go to the police instead of carrying on in this manner, leading zoners through a merry dance chronicling the rollercoaster of Goblinian dalliances.

Post 3 by Freya (This site is so "educational") on Tuesday, 08-Mar-2005 11:06:16

If you are referring to me I explained exactly why in my last post in your other thread. I don't know about the stalker but I don't believe a word of the story about visiting the professor...as I said.

Post 4 by lawlord (I'm going for the prolific poster awards!) on Tuesday, 08-Mar-2005 11:07:53

I should add before people jump to the wrong conclusions and draw adverse inferences about yours truly that I do not, nor shall I ever, nor indeed have I in the past directly or indirectly associated myself with the views of the British National Party. I visit their website from time to time as I do with most legal political parties (The National Front excepted) for information purposes only, as I don't believe one can defeat their arguments without knowing more about their doctrines and ideology than they do.

Post 5 by Goblin (I have proven to myself and the world that I need mental help) on Tuesday, 08-Mar-2005 11:15:30

dear me he's calling me a nazi now what's next I wonder hmm this is no merry dance, just a bloody awful mess, which I can't escape from......

dalliance? ohh no I was doing it out of a need to learn but that seems to be a crime in your eyes.

Post 6 by Freya (This site is so "educational") on Tuesday, 08-Mar-2005 11:18:16

I wonder how many people join a basketball team, wheely or otherwise, and end up with a stalker...not just any stalker but a stalker of the same sex may I add. Sounds like something that belongs on the fiction shelves of my library. Hmmmm reckon I could make a fortune out of this as me next blockbuster.....

Post 7 by lawlord (I'm going for the prolific poster awards!) on Tuesday, 08-Mar-2005 11:20:44

wait a minute, where did I call you a nazi? When I said 'Yours Truly' I was referring to myself. I was merely commenting on your phraseology. As for learning, learning is all very well old chap, but learning at the expense of others? There the line must be drawn. so if a fling is going to injur third parties that's the learning I wouldn't countenance.

Post 8 by lawlord (I'm going for the prolific poster awards!) on Tuesday, 08-Mar-2005 11:25:55

By the way, look at the last sentence of post 2, above. I had no idea I had written such flowing prose....maybe we'll make a novel of this yet eh?

Post 9 by sugarbaby (The voice of reason) on Tuesday, 08-Mar-2005 12:25:40

now if ever we needed proof that goblin is posting these topics to atract attention I think we have it right here.

Post 10 by sugarbaby (The voice of reason) on Tuesday, 08-Mar-2005 13:06:39

but ok goblin if you insist, we won't listen to your crap ... oops i mean the crap

Post 11 by lawlord (I'm going for the prolific poster awards!) on Tuesday, 08-Mar-2005 16:46:40

No don't.....just look at the fine art that is the final sentence post 2. And I think there was a clerical error in the title of this topic.....it should have read, the stalker is not alive!

Post 12 by Godzilla-On-Toast (I've now got the silver prolific poster award! wahoo!) on Tuesday, 08-Mar-2005 22:30:03

Goblin, I'm afraid we can't be bothered, as we're busy meditating on all the suffering in the world. You're just one individual and it's just so trivial in the grand scheme of things. Just don't worry and be happy will ya? Thanks.

Post 13 by Star (Honorary Bitch of the Zone) on Wednesday, 09-Mar-2005 2:14:06

Dear, dear the never ending self-centered adventures of our Drama Queen! What would our Goblin cook up next to stir out attention, emotions, and most of all sympathy? To be continued . . .

Post 14 by Senior (I've now got the bronze prolific poster award! now going for the silver award!) on Wednesday, 09-Mar-2005 14:50:14

Yo Goblin. Perhaps you should think about the train crash in Sri Lanka which you told Katy to think about. With this stalker though, you could either report it to the police, or just deal with him yourself and if necessary with the help of a few of your friends. I mean, act in a way which deters him from ever coming near you again.

Post 15 by lawlord (I'm going for the prolific poster awards!) on Wednesday, 09-Mar-2005 18:16:11

No no no, Wainderful Wangel, that's retributive justice and by saying what you said you are yourself guilty of the offence of incitement.

Post 16 by Senior (I've now got the bronze prolific poster award! now going for the silver award!) on Thursday, 10-Mar-2005 5:16:34

Well I think that everyone should have the right to retalliate, and Goblin has been provoked.

Post 17 by lawlord (I'm going for the prolific poster awards!) on Thursday, 10-Mar-2005 11:23:03

Hmm, you also think we should experiment on human beings, or starve them, or commit them to slave labour. Your views would not have been out of place in Mordor, or more realistically, in the third reich. I rest my case.

Post 18 by lawlord (I'm going for the prolific poster awards!) on Thursday, 10-Mar-2005 11:26:44

And Wainderful wangel, when someone wrongly accuses you of a crime and you're experimented on or hacked to death or committed to slave labour, think about the views you currently hold. We all of us have the potential to be involved in the criminal process, don't forget that. People get wrongly accused, or are in the wrong place at the wrong time. Some people, especially those who agree with the very disturbing views of Wainderful Wangel, would do well to think very carefully about this.

Post 19 by Senior (I've now got the bronze prolific poster award! now going for the silver award!) on Thursday, 10-Mar-2005 14:29:17

These sentences I proposed wouldn't be implemented for 10 years, this would allow time for the criminal to be prooved to be innocent if they wished to appeal against their guilty verdict. After that time if they hadn't been prooven innocent, then the punnishments I earlier proposed should be implemented.

Post 20 by lawlord (I'm going for the prolific poster awards!) on Thursday, 10-Mar-2005 14:41:02

Again, utter nonsense. Some people, such as Steven Downing, derek bentley, James Hanratti, the gilford Four, the birmingham six, the Tottenham three, they all had their sentences overturned, and in bentley's case that was after 46, yes, 46 years! Besides, the fact remains wainderful Wangel, which incidentally is a terrible username to have to keep writing, that some of the barbaric and sinister punishments you propose would have no place in civilised society. They probably wouldn't even make the victim feel better about things. I stand by what I said, what you propose is disgusting, and worthy of the former fascist regimes of yore.

Post 21 by lawlord (I'm going for the prolific poster awards!) on Thursday, 10-Mar-2005 15:05:35

In fact I'll go further. You ought to be ashamed, assuming you've studied history, of advocating this utter claptrap.

Post 22 by Senior (I've now got the bronze prolific poster award! now going for the silver award!) on Friday, 11-Mar-2005 17:15:44

I have and am studied history. We can't wait for ever to find out whether people are innocent or not. There comes a time when we've just got to close the matter. We've got people dying of starvation who are innocent and would make something of themselves if they could and I think that the food which is given to criminals should be given to them. If we use criminals who've taken lives for human experimentations we may end up saving lives in the future, because we may descover cures which were never descovered before. If we reduce some murderers terrorists and pedofiles to slave labour and put them in designated factories, we prevent them from causing harm to deesent people whilst taking advantage of their human resources.

Post 23 by lawlord (I'm going for the prolific poster awards!) on Saturday, 12-Mar-2005 4:44:06

Utter nonsense yet again. We used to have similar punishments, and it was known as har labour. It was ineffective, cost a great deal to run and was of no use to anyone. I stand by what I said: that point of view is deeply disturbing. There is never a cut-off point for someone to prove that they are innocent of a crime wainderful Wangel, never. It's not like a personal injuries action or damages for breach of contract, which have limitation periods. Wainderful wangel, believe me I have done criminology, and have worked with bodies such as the prison reform trust, the Howard League for penal reform and the home office. i can assure you that none of your fascist nonsense would work. I've also seen the appellate criminal process in action, and it is invaluable and indespensable. You have a lot to learn my lad, and awful lot to learn.